Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Bows / Re: Common mistakes in deflex/reflex bows?
« Last post by Tuomo on Today at 02:50:31 am »
Several questions about the programs. Do they allow for some set at given stresses? Does increased set affect efficiency or FDC? If so, by how much? Are there any allowances made for working part of the limb length? Efficiency is lost in working limb length and increases as the working limb shortens, even though strain figures might go up.

No, it is not possible to define set as we understand it. However, there is a “damping” parameter, but it only describes some general energy losses in a bow. Set relates to material properties, and it will be included in the future, so you cannot currently take set into account. Of course, you can interpret strain values: if the compression strain is high, the bow will take set.

Regarding the working part of the limb – yes, of course. You simply define how the bow tapers (just like in my Straight Bow example) and simulate it. I am not sure that efficiency is lost with a longer working limb length; I do not believe it is the determining parameter. Efficiency relates mainly to moving limb mass and hysteresis, and working limb length affects these factors.

Nah, unfortunately it doesn't account for set. Alan Case's spreadhseet allows a bow to be 'pre-stressed' to account for set.

If One happens to have bend test data, then One can predict how much set the bow will take at a given stress level. That's what I've done with my D/R bows above, and anticipate they'll take between 3/4 and 1" set once shot in.

Alan Case’s SuperTiller program (in Excel) does not take set into account. The “pre-stress” feature is purely for pre-stressing, similar to Perry-reflexing a bow. For example, in VirtualBow a reflexed bow has zero stress when unbraced, whereas in SuperTiller you can introduce pre-stress so that the bow has a certain amount of stress even when not braced. As a result, at full draw this kind of bow is more highly stressed than a bow with no pre-stress. It is a nice feature, and hopefully we will have it in VirtualBow in the future as well.

Compression strain values are very useful when predicting set. Wood will take a permanent set when the strain value exceeds about 0.4–0.6% in compression, depending on the wood species. In tension, wood can tolerate on average about 0.9–1.0% strain, but the limit is much lower in compression. Of course, there is an important difference: if the maximum strain is exceeded in tension, the bow breaks, whereas if the bow takes set, it is not yet broken. I am not sure how much compression strain is required to cause chrysals, and I am sure it varies greatly depending on the wood species. However, if you want to estimate set in VirtualBow, I would use 0.4–0.6% compression strain as a guiding range – beyond that, the bow will take set.
2
Bows / Re: Straight bow, optimal tiller profile (VirtualBow)?
« Last post by Tuomo on Today at 02:27:46 am »
Also, the more whip-tillered the bow is, the more efficient it becomes (the reason here being lower tip mass)

Although the tip area with the steep taper is somewhat lighter, I dont think those FPS are attainable because the max strains in bow 9 are 73% higher than bow 4

Of course not! Those are only theoretical values within given boundaries; there is no set, for example. When modelling bows made from natural materials, it is important to interpret the results correctly – what is realistic and what is not. This is where practical experience in making natural-material bows becomes essential. You can learn a lot from theory, but you should not believe everything.
3
Bows / Re: Tillering advice: This thing is kinkier than...
« Last post by sleek on Today at 01:25:10 am »
Kinkier than a garden hose wrapped around a lawnmower.

That tiller looks good considering the limbs each leave the handle at a different angle.
4
Bows / Re: Tillering advice: This thing is kinkier than...
« Last post by Pat B on Today at 12:31:04 am »
What's the length, t/t? What is the draw length and draw weight now? How much sinew have you added to this bow?
5
Bows / Re: yew - a madam's target bow 31# -27"
« Last post by WhistlingBadger on Today at 12:07:21 am »
Awfully pretty work!  Just enough character to be interesting too.
6
Bows / Re: Common mistakes in deflex/reflex bows?
« Last post by willie on December 16, 2025, 11:53:11 pm »
https://www.virtualbow.org/

It's an independent program that you download and install. It's really easy to install and quite easy to use, with a fairly shallow and short learning curve.

I have win 11 and get a warning about it "not being commonly downloaded.  Be sure that you trust the link"   It did download something but the file is called "unconfirmed download" and it won't open...

does  your file name end with  .crdownload?    if so try again

Yes... I have hit 'download 5 or 6 times and the file is the same every time.  "Unconfirmed(random number).crdownload"
Thank you for helping...

windows 11 may be too helpful for its own good
try checking these settings
https://www.supportyourtech.com/tech/how-to-allow-downloads-on-windows-11-a-step-by-step-guide/
7
Bows / Re: Common mistakes in deflex/reflex bows?
« Last post by Aussie Yeoman on December 16, 2025, 11:48:05 pm »
Nah, unfortunately it doesn't account for set. Alan Case's spreadhseet allows a bow to be 'pre-stressed' to account for set.

If One happens to have bend test data, then One can predict how much set the bow will take at a given stress level. That's what I've done with my D/R bows above, and anticipate they'll take between 3/4 and 1" set once shot in.

Several questions about the programs. Do they allow for some set at given stresses? Does increased set affect efficiency or FDC? If so, by how much? Are there any allowances made for working part of the limb length? Efficiency is lost in working limb length and increases as the working limb shortens, even though strain figures might go up.
8
Bows / Tillering advice: This thing is kinkier than...
« Last post by WhistlingBadger on December 16, 2025, 11:46:35 pm »
...I won't finish the title because this is a family friendly forum and all.

Same bow in this thread, if you want to see the early work:
http://www.primitivearcher.com/smf/index.php/topic,73411.msg1029915.html#msg1029915

Got it almost to full draw. 
Unbraced:


25"



Thoughts?

Also:  It's going to come in about 5-6# underweight for elk hunting.  What would adding another layer of sinew do to the draw weight, do you think? 
I'd really like to go whack an elk with this thing.

Thanks!
Thomas
9
Bows / Re: Common mistakes in deflex/reflex bows?
« Last post by Bob Barnes on December 16, 2025, 11:25:57 pm »
https://www.virtualbow.org/

It's an independent program that you download and install. It's really easy to install and quite easy to use, with a fairly shallow and short learning curve.

I have win 11 and get a warning about it "not being commonly downloaded.  Be sure that you trust the link"   It did download something but the file is called "unconfirmed download" and it won't open...

does  your file name end with  .crdownload?    if so try again

Yes... I have hit 'download 5 or 6 times and the file is the same every time.  "Unconfirmed(random number).crdownload"
Thank you for helping...
10
Bows / Re: Common mistakes in deflex/reflex bows?
« Last post by willie on December 16, 2025, 10:56:36 pm »
Several questions about the programs. Do they allow for some set at given stresses? Does increased set affect efficiency or FDC? If so, by how much? Are there any allowances made for working part of the limb length? Efficiency is lost in working limb length and increases as the working limb shortens, even though strain figures might go up.

set is not taken into account with the program.   It is up to you to choose a MOE value for the materiel used,  and review your design to see that stresses remains below the level you feel set will occur at.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10