I have been gluing bamboo backing on osage for a very long time, and the sum of the 2 is way more than a single piece of the same thickness.
Have you measured the difference? Much of the data I have seen indicates that bamboo and osage are similar in terms of the modulus of elasticity (MOE), so the combination shouldn't be much different than either on its own at the same thickness as the lam bow. If one is much stiffer than the other (higher MOE) then the combination would feel much stiffer.
I'm thinking that all we care about in a backing is tensile strength. Correct me if I'm wrong. I was looking at the Wood Database and it doesn't give tensile strength. Is one of those things listed there equivalent? Oh, if we only had an engineer
If only, huh?
The wood database calls the tensile strength the Modulus of Rupture. It shows an MOR of 11,020-24,450psi for bamboo and an MOR of 18,650psi for osage. That number is a fair bit lower than other data I have seen for osage, though. MOE for bamboo is 2,610,000-2,900,000psi and 1,689,000psi for osage. Again, that is low compared to other data I have seen on osage. If it is accurate, then bamboo would really stiffen up osage in a lam bow.
could well be the boo but if I glue two wood lams together with a little reflex, they become several times stronger than the original wood it seems...?
That could be the reflex. I was searching for info on gluelam vs wood beams and there was a few comments that it was because the gluelams are arched.
My experience with reflex is limited, but so far I would agree that reflex seems to really stiffen up the limbs out of proportion to the change made/added.
Mark