Author Topic: thinest rings.... ever  (Read 5032 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline duke3192

  • Member
  • Posts: 195
  • pm109331
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2015, 07:21:41 pm »
I know it has been said on here before, look at the ratio between early growth and late growth. Thin rings = slow growth, good if the ratio is about the same or smaller in the early growth, those will make awsome bows, but are a real pain to clean up or tiller, you can mess up in an eye blink, scrape and sand, and a lot of patience.
charter member of traditional bow hunters of Florida.

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2015, 09:16:16 pm »


Thought this thread could at least use a pic.
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline JonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,906
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2015, 09:18:40 pm »
Man that tree had a rough life. You did it a favor by cutting it.

Offline Hrothgar

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,477
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2015, 09:50:06 pm »
Can't help but be curious Sleek, did either one of those staves come from my stash--the 31 ring per inch staves?  ;D  I have one down to floor tiller but still haven't managed to save a ring on the back. My eyesight and my patience are failing equally, think its time to post it on Trading Post--in exchange for anything!
" To be, or not to be"...decisions, decisions, decisions.

Offline Selfbowman

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,161
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2015, 09:59:37 pm »
Burn both and get another stave. That's what I would do. Been there done that. Osage is not that hard to find yet. Maybe someday. Arvin
Well I'll say!!  Osage is king!!

Offline bowandarrow473

  • Member
  • Posts: 696
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2015, 10:11:03 pm »
I'll take the stave!!!!!
Whatever you are, be a good one.

Offline Blaflair2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,042
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2015, 10:24:13 pm »
I'm working on this
Nothing ventured nothing gained

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2015, 10:29:29 pm »
  I had bought a ton of that thin ringed osage a few years ago. I rough chase it with a draw knife then go down one more ring with a well sharpened scraper. Very easy, just a little patience, doesn't really take all that long either. I really like thin ringed osage, the belly is beautiful when you finish, lots of v's pointing to the tip.

Offline DavidV

  • Member
  • Posts: 472
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2015, 10:38:51 pm »
Dosn't look much thinner than this osage I got from Patrick, ended up performing really well and it worked nicer than the fast growth osage I've cut here.



Springfield, MO

Offline lebhuntfish

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,823
  • If the wood will bend, I'll make it beautiful!
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2015, 11:21:46 pm »
Nice David! If you can, bring that one with you on Saturday! I would love to see it! Patrick
Once an Eagle Scout, always an Eagle Scout!

Missouri, where all the best wood is! Well maybe not the straightest!

Building a bow has been the most rewarding, peaceful, and frustrating things I have ever made with my own two hands!

Offline Selfbowman

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,161
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2015, 11:54:11 pm »
Steve I admit no patience. I was tring to chase a growth ring on a yew stave once with a single edge razor blade as a scraper. Used all those patience up. I have seen good fine ring osage and good 1/8" ring staves that where good also. There is a lot of fine ring osage along the Red river . The osage is dark brownish with a hint of red in it. I don't care for it. I'll take Kansas , east Tn. ,Mo., central Tx. Osage over it any time. Arvin
« Last Edit: September 09, 2015, 12:13:00 am by Selfbowman »
Well I'll say!!  Osage is king!!

Offline Pappy

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 32,204
  • if you have to ask you wouldn't understand ,Tenn.
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #26 on: September 09, 2015, 05:26:01 am »
I prefer thin ringed Osage , I personally think it makes a better bow.JMO  ;) :) Seems much denser and I just like it better, don't mind chasing a ring on it either, I kind of enjoy it. :)
  Pappy
Clarksville,Tennessee
TwinOaks Bowhunters
Life is Good

blackhawk

  • Guest
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #27 on: September 09, 2015, 06:43:50 am »
Theres chaseable rings between the bottom of your thumb fingernail n knuckle...ive made quite a few bows with rings that size where i mentioned in your stave

Offline PatM

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,737
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #28 on: September 09, 2015, 07:14:28 am »
When the end cut reveals such thin outer rings why not try to squeeze less staves from the log and allow yourself further depth up the triangle of the split in order to retain sufficient width?

Offline Selfbowman

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,161
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #29 on: September 09, 2015, 08:55:56 am »
One more reason for us to not want the same kind of tree. The discussion may sure enough become arguements at that point. Mine . No mine. No it's mine.  >:( :(  Sleek I wish you good luck with your bow . Hope it shoots like the best you have ever made. Arvin
« Last Edit: September 09, 2015, 09:00:17 am by Selfbowman »
Well I'll say!!  Osage is king!!