Author Topic: thinest rings.... ever  (Read 5033 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
thinest rings.... ever
« on: September 06, 2015, 12:56:05 pm »
I have two beautiful staves of osage. Only one problem. The rings are so thin, even with a magnifying glass, your not gonna see them.  And if I chase below that, I run out of width on the stave. So, not being loco enough to try to chase a ring, im thinking bamboo backed. But out of curiosity,  anyone ever run into this befoe?
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,634
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2015, 01:47:31 pm »
I love thin ringed osage. It makes a great bow. I usually back it with rawhide.
 Boo or hickory backing would be an option but you'll have to decrown it first.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2015, 02:13:50 pm »
I love it also. It makes beautiful handles, and I think it has better performance because of less mass. But this is insane thin. I got bamboo. Now question is, I have two staves 7 foot long. Id like two bamboo shorties. One a deflex reflex andthe other a recurve. Do I really cut two straight 86" staves down to size? I feel guilty doing that. How short can you go and get a 28" draw with a boo osage lam, stiff handle, 40-50# draw?
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline lebhuntfish

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,823
  • If the wood will bend, I'll make it beautiful!
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2015, 02:30:11 pm »
Don't know for sure buddy, but if you bring them next weekend to Erics I bet we can decrown them on his jointer! Patrick
Once an Eagle Scout, always an Eagle Scout!

Missouri, where all the best wood is! Well maybe not the straightest!

Building a bow has been the most rewarding, peaceful, and frustrating things I have ever made with my own two hands!

Offline Knoll

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,016
  • Mikey
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2015, 02:39:01 pm »
we can decrown them on his jointer! Patrick

cheat! cheat!   :)
... alone in distant woods or fields, in unpretending sproutlands or pastures tracked by rabbits, even in a bleak and, to most, cheerless day .... .  I suppose that this value, in my case, is equivalent to what others get by churchgoing & prayer.  Hank Thoreau, 1857

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2015, 02:42:00 pm »
No thanks. I'll use my KaBar.
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,634
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2015, 04:06:42 pm »
Build the bows you want with the staves you have but pick out the best portion for the bows. What's left over can be made into risers, turkey box calls, tip overlays, knife scales and the list goes on.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2015, 04:12:29 pm »
I do need a hatchet handle....  wait a minute.  That leabes me 30" drop. Thems billets! Hehe...
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,634
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2015, 04:16:04 pm »
Not necessarily if you pick the best for each bow.  :-\
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2015, 04:32:12 pm »
True.... and now im home looking at them its hatchet handles.  Good ones though.
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2015, 04:33:34 pm »
So, whats the shortest boo backed stiff handle you guys would think for 40-50#@28?
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline bowandarrow473

  • Member
  • Posts: 696
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2015, 05:02:50 pm »
I'd say 60-62 inches but I saw where you got a 54in stiff handle to 26in the other day  :o so I'm sure you might could do it at 58in long.
Whatever you are, be a good one.

Offline JonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,906
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2015, 05:23:07 pm »
I think you could do 56 easily. Make it a three inch bulbous handle and make it work right up to the handle.

Offline Blaflair2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,042
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2015, 06:32:03 pm »
I'm working one now, pretty thin rings. I found one that worked out. It seems to want to take set on me. And I'm not done tillering. I'm gonna hear treat the belly after. But was curious if thinned ringed Osage was more sub par unlike other woods
Nothing ventured nothing gained

Offline sleek

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,764
Re: thinest rings.... ever
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2015, 07:05:24 pm »
I havent noticed a difference in set between thick or thin ring osageand I have worked lots of both. However I also never directly compared the two either.  That being said, I always get set while tillering, but never very much.

There was a black locust bow I made. Had only two rings fat rings in it. I heat treated the belly many times until it was purple and black. 40#@28 4" set. I have no idea why but thick rings didnt help it out none.
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others