Perhaps with a bit of research and trial/error, it would be possible to adjust/refine a bow's tiller to give the same benefit in cast without having to be drawn a full 32". Obviously many archers just aren't built to draw 32", but most commercially available warbows are tillered the same, out to 32". I wonder if a bit of tweaking and redistributing of the working limb at full draw could make up the difference on a shorter draw? What a horribly wordy way of saying something simple.
Somebody who doesn't draw 32" won't get the full benefit of a warbow tillered to 32". So is there a way of keeping the cast the same, while allowing for a shorter draw?
IMONo, it's simple arithmetic and physics!
Unless of course you resort to the scientific redesign of the bow as per Hickman which gave us the modern target bow, or change to a different bow style. (Arguably the Victorian tiller is more efficient but prob not so with heavier arrows like a warbow)
It's like saying can we adapt a fish to ride a bicycle... yeah, but it won't be fish anymore!
Just multiply the power stroke by half the draw weight. If the bow has a fairly linear force draw curve it's a good approximation. Just try it for a couple of different draw lengths.
Even at the same draw weight:-
Say you assume a 7" brace (measured from the
back of the bow, (same as the draw length is measured) that gives a power stroke of 21" vs 25" for the 28 and 32" draws.... that's 19% increase evenat the same draw weight!
IMOThe whole concept of the handle not starting to bend until the last few inches of draw is just bonkers. The whole bow moves in unison all the time... ok it may not be visible to the naked eye, but the force is being applied to the whole limb over the whole draw. As the string angle changes the tips could possible get less leverage on them, but c'mon we are talking about longbows not horse bows with weird angles, bridges and changes in force draw curve.
Del