Probably not, not this time. I did add a course of sinew to a similar bow and gained about 30% improvement in bolt speed, but no real increase in draw weight as I had to re tiller it. I might re do it in yew though.
My main interest was in whether the original could have been built without set and I’m fairly convinced it couldn’t have been. The original is described as being straight with only traces of sapwood at one end. There are written sources in Italy describing crossbow makers’ guild rules controlling the ways in which sinewed wood bows could be made and sold in the late 13th century and the original is without context approximately of 12th or 13th century date.. A straight heartwood yew lath could indicate sinew, but it could also have been chewed on by borers or squashed under debris for 800 years. Also, why go to all the hassle of sinewing such a tiny bow? Why not just make a bigger one? It’s all a bit of a puzzle. Sinewed and 2mm thicker and in yew puts it at maybe 80 to 100lb, and that’s a punchy little bow, but 100lb in yew is easy to build…