0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I'm pretty sure that it began to take set earlier than Arvin's "normal" selfbows...the horn belly was done to save the stave and to also test the horn belly.
The horn is going to test the backs ability to hold. The belly already showed it can't take the strain like normal ring orientation.
Quote from: sleek on February 02, 2021, 04:07:13 pmThe horn is going to test the backs ability to hold. The belly already showed it can't take the strain like normal ring orientation. Horn is not as stiff as wood and bends easier.
Yes. There was a big argument a few years back where even the horn bow guys were of the opinion that horn would easily break a wood back. Obviously a wood back can still break with a horn belly but they were saying it was practically going to blow apart the back early on as if it forced the back into greater tension stress right away.
Quote from: Bob Barnes on February 02, 2021, 03:54:07 pmI'm pretty sure that it began to take set earlier than Arvin's "normal" selfbows...the horn belly was done to save the stave and to also test the horn belly.Yes I’m not going to test the stave to more failure than normal. No need to. Answer edge grain is not as good by its self. Going to try the horn on belly. If that doesn’t work there will be one last try. Reduce the back and put boo on it. This will make the edge grain act as a series of I beams separated by the early wood. Then I give up. The y’all have to go back to the computer.
Horn is not as stiff as wood and bends easier.
I honestly thought horn was stiffer, thats why I reccomend reducing its width on the belly..