Author Topic: red oak attempt number 2..  (Read 5758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aero86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,263
red oak attempt number 2..
« on: September 06, 2010, 07:14:02 pm »
it broke.  i pulled it to almost 25 and it broke.  was shooting for about 40lbs@27.  might be too much to ask for red oak, or too much to ask for my tillering skills.  i had thined it down, than started tillering it, mostly working on the outer limbs.  even reduced the sides of it on the limb ends. 

with stiff outter limbs, maybe its hard for me to tell on the tillering where its bending too much or not enough..

this was at 20 inches..
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t49/whiteneon98/bow%20stuff/013.jpg
profsaffel  "clogs like the devil" I always figured Lucifer to be more of a disco kind of guy.

Offline sailordad

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,045
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2010, 07:31:20 pm »
got a pic of the break?
i always wanted a harley,untill it became the "thing to ride"
i ride because i love to,not to be part of the crowd

Offline profsaffel

  • Member
  • Posts: 420
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2010, 07:42:37 pm »
Hmmm, red oak is capable of handling a 40 pound bow... Did the break occur near the fades? Seems from your pic it's doing most of the bending from mid limb to fades, putting a lot of stress at that area. From mid limb to tip looks to be resting easy comparatively.

-Prof
Professor of History, Student of Bowyery

Offline El Destructo

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,078
  • Longhaired Crippled Hippie Biker And Proud Of It!!
    • Desert Sportz Primitive Archery
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2010, 09:22:59 pm »
I am with Tim on this...Get Us a few Pictures of the Bow..and the Break...Red Oak is capable of a 55-60 pound Bow...if designed correctly...
As a species we're fundamentally insane. Put more than two of us in a room, we pick sides and start dreaming up ways to kill one another.Why do you think we invented politics and religion.
Think HEALTHCARE Is Expensive Now,Wait Till It's FREE
Do Or Do Not,There Is No TRY
2024...We Will Overcome

Offline aero86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2010, 09:45:53 pm »
i know at lengths, they are good for decent poundage.  but this one was 48 inches long.  4 inch handle, 1 inch fades.  the siyahs are only about 2.5 inches long.  the ends of the limbs where the siyahs are glue, are 3.5 inches.

after looking at the break, the belly seems to have failed first, but maybe not.  i havent broken enough to be able to tell. 

profsaffel  "clogs like the devil" I always figured Lucifer to be more of a disco kind of guy.

Offline 4est Trekker

  • Member
  • Posts: 311
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2010, 11:03:55 pm »
It looks like you didn't radius (i.e round) your edges before tillering.  You need to be sure to do that to both the back and belly.  I get them nice and smooth and then burnish them.  It'll save you a lot of heartache.  Also, I think the design was pushing it for red oak.  Hickory could probably handle it if everything went nearly perfectly.  But, with the added leverage of the siyahs and the stiff handle, you were left with a short working limb doing a great deal of work.  But, all in all, I bet it was a great learning experience! :)
"Walk softly, and carry a bent stick."

"And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, giving thanks to God the Father through him."  Col. 3:17

Offline aero86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2010, 11:14:53 pm »
so, rounding the edges will help?  i tried to keep as flat as possible to make sure the force was distributed evenly along the back.  i guess the belly is a bit different.  maybe i dont understand the compression force, as i kinda understand the forces on the back.
profsaffel  "clogs like the devil" I always figured Lucifer to be more of a disco kind of guy.

Lombard

  • Guest
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2010, 11:29:22 pm »
Aero86, I've done better than a couple dozen Red Oak bows, anywhere from twenty five pounds to fifty five pounds. Mostly pyramid, some rigid handle, and some bending in the handle. With a few failures along the way, the majority of them have launched hundreds, and even better than a thousand arrows. Most are still preforming well. Don't discount Red Oak yet, and definitely radius those edges. Don't give up on the red just yet, try again.

Offline aero86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2010, 11:44:40 pm »
lombard, i have two that have hundreds of shots on them as well.  but they are better than 65 inches tall..  this one was 48 inches.  i just dont know if my tillering skills are up to something that short with the draw length id like to use.  i might have to bite the built and build the next one a couple inches longer.
profsaffel  "clogs like the devil" I always figured Lucifer to be more of a disco kind of guy.

Offline okiecountryboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 502
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2010, 12:19:51 am »
Aero
Check your PM's

Ron
God, honor, country, bows, and guns.

Offline George Tsoukalas

  • Member
  • Posts: 9,425
    • Traditional and Primitive Archers
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2010, 05:02:30 am »
My skills would not be up to that design on any wood for a self bow. Jawge
Set Happens!
If you ain't breakin' you ain't makin!

Offline aero86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2010, 06:40:34 pm »
so, im thinking i will try it again.  the tiller was looking good i thought, even if it is kinda bendy towards the handle.  when i made my lines for the belly wood removal, i made it horizontal.  next one ill make it thicker at the handle.  i was trying to get as much material working as possible. 

after removing that wood, maybe i should get it bending and then move towards the handle..  it just seems like after a certain draw length, the outer limbs will quit bending.  maybe not, im just thinking out loud, as ive never tillered this kind of bow before
profsaffel  "clogs like the devil" I always figured Lucifer to be more of a disco kind of guy.

Offline walkabout

  • Member
  • Posts: 192
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2010, 09:04:17 pm »
im thinking maybe the problem was that the grain ran off there and the flex made it split. kens design seems like it would flex a little bit in the handle, which is probably why he used the dowels to hold it from popping off. he also used a backing, which im sure helps. not saying its not possible with red oak but insurance is just that. good luck, if i get mine started soon ill post my results as well.

Offline 4est Trekker

  • Member
  • Posts: 311
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2010, 09:30:29 pm »
Yeah, you must round the edges on any working part of the bow, especially on the back.  Any sharp edge will succumb to the strains induced on it and pop. 
"Walk softly, and carry a bent stick."

"And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, giving thanks to God the Father through him."  Col. 3:17

Offline aero86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,263
Re: red oak attempt number 2..
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2010, 10:15:53 pm »
there might have been a run off there.  i couldnt see one.  so, can i just burnish the corners round?  say with a screwdriver or something harder than the wood?
maybe the next one i try will have a bendy handle, though i have yet to make a bow with a bendy handle.  the reason i dont is  the wider  handles are uncomfortable for me, and i like the thicker, less wide handles better, if yall know what im trying to say..
profsaffel  "clogs like the devil" I always figured Lucifer to be more of a disco kind of guy.