Primitive Archer

Main Discussion Area => English Warbow => Topic started by: Kviljo on February 09, 2008, 11:00:38 pm

Title: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 09, 2008, 11:00:38 pm
New warbow. 95# @ 30". 76,5" ntn. 41x32mm at the grip. Sidenocks modeled after the one preserved. Fast grown norwegian yew.

(http://kviljo.no/bue/95.jpg)


...and for those of us who are into making replicas...       ...this is as close as I will get without seeing the thing live I think. - apart from the extra notch for the stringer.

(http://kviljo.no/bue/95b.jpg)

(http://www.scortonarrow.com/forum_pics/hornnock01.jpg)
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Badger on February 10, 2008, 03:05:38 pm
KV, I like it, replicas always have a special place with me when they are truly in character such as yours veis. I especialy like the tiller you put on that bow. Have you tried it out yet? Steve
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 10, 2008, 05:54:00 pm
Thanks :)

Yep, tried it today, but I found out it's a bit too heavy for me to shoot more than a few shots. It shoots very well though with effectively only 1/2" stringfollow. So I shot my other new bow instead. It's birch/walnut and draws 70# @ 28". Glued in about 2" reflex, and it has kept about a 1/2" of it, even though it is 82" long. It too is based on a medieval artefact - a norwegian version of the laminated saami/Finno-Ugrian/asiatic to-wood-bows.


(http://kviljo.no/bue/toved/a.jpg)


(http://kviljo.no/bue/toved/b.jpg)


(http://kviljo.no/bue/toved/d.jpg)
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: SimonUK on February 10, 2008, 06:36:20 pm
Very nice bow! Did you try to follow the dimensions of the mary Rose bows?

The nock looks very close to the original. Having made it, any thoughts on why the original is that shape?
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 10, 2008, 06:48:20 pm
Yep, it follows basic MR-specs, although I made it a little thinner because the stave was so marginal.

Haven't thought about why the nock is shaped the way it is. It seems to follow the tradition though, as almost all longbows, from the Nydam- to the MR-finds have sidenocks.
I bet there was a variety of hornnock-shapes back then too though.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: SimonUK on February 10, 2008, 07:02:01 pm
Initially I thought the handle was a bit stiff, but there's some reflex at that point, isn't there?  So in effect it's fairly circular.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 10, 2008, 07:04:47 pm
Yep, it's got a bit of reflex at the handle. I tillered it from straight lines drawn on the side of it, and made sure it bends progressively more from the grip to the tips.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: D. Tiller on February 11, 2008, 12:40:14 am
Nice bow! Hows it shoot?
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Justin Snyder on February 11, 2008, 01:28:55 am
Pretty impressive bow kviljo.  Justin
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Rod on February 11, 2008, 07:10:14 am
Any bow, especially a heavy one is easier to string if you can get the horn nocks to run flush into the wood. That's why we make them that way, not just because it looks more elegant.
The only time I got injured with a heavy bow, it was when I was stringing one and stalled at the nock, like tripping on a kerb stone...

Rod.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 11, 2008, 07:36:19 am
Yep, I could probably make the transtition a bit more even, and still be faithful to the original. But I won't ;D

Mostly because I use a selftightening loop with sidenocks, that make it a bit more cumbersome to string anyway, because I like to make sure the string has settled well into the slot and that it is lined up.

On a victorian nock however... :)
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: alanesq on February 11, 2008, 04:52:05 pm

Brilliant nock that - puts my attempts to shame

Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 11, 2008, 08:59:49 pm
Not really, because there must have been a lot of variation to these. But I must admit that it came out closer to the original than I first thought.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: adb on February 14, 2008, 02:05:39 pm
Looks very stiff & non-bending in the handle, for a warbow?
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 14, 2008, 07:54:10 pm
Check out the unbraced pic - the stave has quite a bit setback in the handle :)

Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: SimonUK on February 15, 2008, 06:53:38 am
What's the dark patch about 15 cm from the handle on the right limb? If that's a knot, you've done extremely well not to let it break.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 15, 2008, 07:35:50 am
Yep, it's a knot. That one have had me worrying a bit, but it seems to be just fine.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: ozark caveman on February 23, 2008, 01:52:11 am
Nice Bow but look at the house in the background 8)
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: cowboy on February 23, 2008, 02:43:17 am
Great bow kviljo! Don't quite know how to say this but that's a big one - don't know anything about ELB's ;D. Love your countryside, kind of alien to me but very interesting - you should post a few more pic's of it. What kind of trees are those?
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on February 25, 2008, 08:16:52 pm
Thanks :)

I might be wrong, but the one the bows are leaning against, is beech. But it is of course a protected area, because of the church.

Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: cowboy on February 26, 2008, 11:18:56 am
Cool - thanks..
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Steinn on March 06, 2008, 01:57:38 pm
Is that the Borgund stavekirke? Also very nice bows!
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Kviljo on March 06, 2008, 11:58:14 pm
Nope, it's Fantoft Stavkirke/stave chuch.

It's about as cool as a church can get, hehe  :)
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: faltenhemd on March 04, 2009, 10:38:33 am
nice bow!

hope you dont mind me bringing up this old topic, but i got a question:

whats a sidenock?

are the horn nocks of your bow only cut at one side of the nock?

    /\
   /  \
o(    (o

o= string

or are they symmetrical?

   /\
  /  \
o)   (o


Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: alanesq on March 04, 2009, 12:14:22 pm
I can answer that question no problem ;-)
As I have recently created a web page with all the info I have on sidenocks as there doesn't seem to be much info about them out there

see:   http://www.alanesq.com/sidenock.htm (http://www.alanesq.com/sidenock.htm)

btw - yes, they only have a slot on one side of the nock
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: skerm on March 05, 2009, 03:41:02 am
Hi, Alan!

Nice site you put up there. What about the third picture on it, the one showing bow tips in gray scale? Are you sure that it shows yew bows found on the Mary Rose?

Cheers,
Daniel
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: alanesq on March 05, 2009, 04:33:37 am
now you mention it the growth rings dont look like Mary Rose yew ? ?
not sure where I got that picture from, - I will see if I can find a different one

although if they arn't Mary Rose bows I would be interested to know what they are as they also have side nocks

thanks
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: Yeomanbowman on March 05, 2009, 05:18:27 am
Hi, Alan!

Nice site you put up there. What about the third picture on it, the one showing bow tips in gray scale? Are you sure that it shows yew bows found on the Mary Rose?

Cheers,
Daniel

Daniel/Alan,
I think the image is from Hardy's 'Longbow'.  Not all of the MR bows had really tight grain and it is theorised that some may have been indigenous yew.  Steve Stratton may be able to tell you more.
Title: Re: 95# @ 30"
Post by: faltenhemd on March 05, 2009, 06:06:53 am
thanks alan!
i didnt know about the mary rose bows having sidenocks.
cool page  :)