Primitive Archer

Main Discussion Area => Bows => Topic started by: fiddler49 on June 23, 2015, 09:42:32 pm

Title: Cable back vine maple
Post by: fiddler49 on June 23, 2015, 09:42:32 pm
Here's an example of cable and bridge backing using a heavy nylon cord. I first make two separate loops, double them and loop around limbs with a ring hitch. Then thread back and forth
7 strands of cord between the two loops and tension up each strand pulling nice and tight. Then place two wood bridges under cable. Now I spiral wrap the cable to the handle,
then take about 30 feet of cord and run half hitches all the way from one end to the other. I gained about 9 pounds of draw. The bridges add a lot of tension instead of twisting the cables like Dick Baugh used in his PrimitiveWays article and makes it a bit easier. The bow is a vine maple stave I have shot it quite a bit. 63" ntn, bend in handle, 42 lbs @28 before the cable. About 51 lbs @28 now. I draw to 31.5" I'll shoot it tomorrow at the range and see if it made much difference  in arrow speed. I'll try to post the pics now? cheers fiddler49

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220001_zpsftj9oohe.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220002_zpsoyb0hxcs.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220003_zpskn581a5a.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220004_zpskmw7kcoh.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220005_zpsa5cw7rus.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220006_zpsalwxwp1t.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220007_zps6xt6iu4d.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220008_zpsxdrd0r0f.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220010_zpsiwayqllg.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220011_zpsrlgzsd7z.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220012_zpsna6guvng.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220013_zpsox8ertqq.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220014_zpsbefdo1nv.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7220017_zps3izqc7wx.jpg)

I got out to the range and shot a bunch with the cable back bow. It's shooting faster with the heavier draw weight!!! Here's a full draw pic.

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7230001_zpskyfbdcbg.jpg)

(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i127/fiddler49/Cable%20backing/P7230002_zps2jf5gyqr.jpg)
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: alwayslookin on June 24, 2015, 12:52:32 am
That's a serious weight increase.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: paco664 on June 24, 2015, 01:01:55 am
That is just freaking cool! !
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Willibow on June 24, 2015, 02:25:29 am
Very cool Fiddler!  Thanks for sharing!  a 25% weight increase is nothing to scoff at  8)
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Blaflair2 on June 24, 2015, 11:22:03 am
The bow u said was 42@28, so now is it 51@28 or 51@31.5? The longer draw my account for the weight
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: bowmo on June 24, 2015, 11:45:08 am
Very cool! Looks awesome at full draw....a beautiful arc with a little Brooklyn Bridge on it! Adjustable weight on a primitive bow is def cool. I have a Penobscot that has 48 pound main bow and can go up to 68 pounds with the back bow.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: nakedfeet on June 24, 2015, 01:31:31 pm
Looks like the bridges have created stiff spots, though. Could you do this without the string bridges, or lower ones?
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Dakota Kid on June 24, 2015, 03:26:13 pm
I may give that a whirl next time I over-tiller. I think I may opt for antler instead of wood for the bridges. I should be able to make them much thinner. I think the thickness may be to blame in the creation of stiff spots. Would there be any advantage to adding another set of bridges?
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: PEARL DRUMS on June 24, 2015, 03:33:48 pm
Those bridges aren't causing the flat spots or hinges. I say that only because you can see them at brace all the same. 
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: fiddler49 on June 24, 2015, 09:37:52 pm
I'm not an expert on cable backing. I've tried it before by twisting the cable with short levers while the cable is flat against bow back.It didn't seem to do much. You could make lots of bridges, taller bridges , shorter bridges, skinny bridges. Not much written about this. I haven't seen any cable back bows on PaleoPlanet or here since I've been here so you all will have to just experiment like me. I don't measure draw weight past 28"
because I use a bathroom scale with my tiller tree and I have to put my head down near string to read scale,EEk!!!
but I do draw 31.5" using a thumb release. If the bridges are too heavy or too close to the tips they will slow the bow down! The farther away from the bow back the cable is, the more it will stretch when you draw the bow and the more energy it can hold! Dick Baugh says in his article that nylon has about the same elastic properties as sinue but you can over stretch nylon so it looses it's elasticity. Thats what I might have done using the twisters the first time I tried this. Anyway we need more hard science on this subject so get out there and experiment lads!!! cheers fiddler49
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: DC on June 24, 2015, 09:58:36 pm
Neat experiment. I'm wondering if you had left the cable a little farther from the bow when you tied all those half hitches. Like you said, when you tried it with the cable flat against the back it didn't work that well. If the cable had gone from the handle to the bridge to the anchor so the cable was straight you could have pulled it a little tighter. Maybe even pull a little reflex into it. Just spitballin', I know nothing about this.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: bowmo on June 25, 2015, 12:27:37 am
Hows the nose with the blocks? I feel like I would have to add a bit of leather in between them.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: fiddler49 on June 25, 2015, 03:09:19 am
DC, I tightened each of the 7 strands before I put the bridges under the cable. The bridges tightened the cable even more and the half hitch lacing tightened the cable extra tight.
Bowmo, A bit of leather under the bridges is a good idea, especially with the crown on a stave. One thing to remember round out the sharp edges on the bridges or you might cut the cable or dent/crush the bow wood.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: nakedfeet on June 25, 2015, 02:30:57 pm
Those bridges aren't causing the flat spots or hinges. I say that only because you can see them at brace all the same.

I think we'd have to see the bow braced without the cable backing to judge that. My thinking is that the tension is going to change even at brace.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Spotted Dog on June 25, 2015, 03:35:09 pm
This makes me think of the Penobscot bow from Maine . The double bow.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: bradsmith2010 on June 25, 2015, 05:06:44 pm
nice thanks for sharing   :)
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: simson on June 27, 2015, 01:31:11 am
Good experiment, Mike - thanks for sharing.
I have only one cable backed bow under my belt, so I'm no expert either. I have backed the same bow a few times with different cable backing designs. I used B50 by the way.
My experience is: you can affect the tiller by the position of the bridges (stiffer under the bridge). The higher the bridge the bigger the effect.
i have tillered out the bow before applying the cable, best result was with more bridges and more or less the same distance from the back.
I think we should go to the limits of the cable (nylon or sinew), just because of it's mass. So it makes sense to do the backing while the bow is braced backwards (reflex) and to do the backing not on the back, but with a distance of a 1/4" or perhaps more.

I'm with you, it's an interesting item and we should have more results.
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Limbit on June 27, 2015, 02:16:58 am
Could you tell more about the placement of the bridges? What is the logic around bridge placement?
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Blob on June 27, 2015, 09:31:41 am
Awesome!

This makes me think of the Penobscot bow from Maine . The double bow.

This was my first thought as well.

Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: fiddler49 on June 28, 2015, 02:24:27 am
Not much logic to bridge placement, half way between handle and tip anchor. If you had two bridges per limb then split each limb into thirds. You could put a bridge on each side of the handle and two or three out on each limb. I'm just making this stuff up as I go!!!
Like I said I'm no expert on this stuff.  cheers fiddler49
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: Limbit on June 28, 2015, 03:30:20 am
One more question: What keeps the cable from slipping down the limb further? Is it simply really tight or did you knotch the limb or something like that. Seems like it would be sliding down unevenly and difficult to balance the cable position. Thanks for the reply by the way!
Title: Re: Cable back vine maple
Post by: fiddler49 on June 28, 2015, 04:01:05 pm
It's just like a fiddle bridge, lots of tension, cheers fiddler