Primitive Archer

Main Discussion Area => Bows => Topic started by: DC on February 18, 2015, 02:04:04 pm

Title: Nomenclature
Post by: DC on February 18, 2015, 02:04:04 pm
When you're talking about bows and use R/D or D/R do you start with the handle? Would a D/R have a deflexed handle and reflexed tips?
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: TimBo on February 18, 2015, 02:14:17 pm
R/D would be deflex at the handle, reflexed tips. 
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PEARL DRUMS on February 18, 2015, 02:18:15 pm
RD and DR are the same to me. Cant see any reason a fella would reflex his handle and deflex his tips.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PatM on February 18, 2015, 02:29:22 pm
 Both the same thing.
  The true examples of bows with reflexed grips and deflexed tips or limbs are generally classified by culture and given more descriptive names..
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: TimBo on February 18, 2015, 02:42:01 pm
Well, rats...that's what I get for answering first.  I hadn't ever seen anyone use the term D/R, but it made me think of a gullwing-type bow.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PatM on February 18, 2015, 02:46:02 pm
You'll probably find just as many if not more using D/R to define a typical modern bow. Seems to make sense to start naming features from the center out.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Badger on February 18, 2015, 03:00:56 pm
  I have always thought that D/R would be better than r/d but everyone seems to recognise r/d for some reason.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Springbuck on February 18, 2015, 03:29:34 pm
Yeah, the name just stuck.      Even harder for me to understand is how people describe the curve.  Someone will say "I gave it 2" of deflex and 3" of reflex."    So to one guy that means the tips are an inch ahead of the handle, and the other guy means 3" ahead of the handle.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PEARL DRUMS on February 18, 2015, 06:07:25 pm
Im a 1" guy myself.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PatM on February 18, 2015, 06:11:26 pm
Im a 1" guy myself.
Not sure if bragging...
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PEARL DRUMS on February 18, 2015, 06:51:50 pm
Don't act like your some kind of a 3" man Pat, I know better.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: missilemaster on February 18, 2015, 07:07:59 pm
I like D/R. To me a bow starts at the handle and goes out from there. But its not a hill to die on.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Marc St Louis on February 18, 2015, 07:38:36 pm
I used to call them D/R but everyone else called them R/D so I quit
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Traxx on February 18, 2015, 08:53:15 pm
D/R and R/D are not the same.In fact they are the exact opposite.The term,R/d for the popular style today,is misused and often by those,who should know better.
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PatM on February 18, 2015, 09:22:55 pm
 They are the same in the sense that arguing about which part gets preference in the naming process is fruitless at this point.
 When people use either term  they are almost certainly talking about the same thing.

 
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Traxx on February 18, 2015, 09:29:31 pm
When i use the term R/D,im talking about the double curve bow,Reflexed at the riser and deflexed mid limb.The type used from Canada to mexico,by Native people.Musta been somethin to em for so many to use em. ;)
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: PatM on February 18, 2015, 09:38:36 pm
That's what I mean about using another specialised term for those styles that probably predates modern abbreviations. "Double curve" or "gullwing" seems to work better for that and most people instantly know exactly what you mean by that with no confusing it with a modern hybrid longbow.
 I wonder what the Natives called them... probably "bows" lol
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: dylanholderman on February 18, 2015, 09:56:19 pm
I've always wondered if the "gullwing" bows people talk about aren't just a bow with a reflexed handle that has taken a lot of set from being left strung  ???
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Traxx on February 19, 2015, 12:06:58 am
dylanholderman,

Thats been a subject that has been debated many times as well. :laugh:
Title: Re: Nomenclature
Post by: Dances with squirrels on February 19, 2015, 06:51:53 am
I use deflex/reflex. When folks call the same bow reflex/deflex I feel they're incorrect, but know what they're talking about so don't bother correcting them.