Primitive Archer

Main Discussion Area => Bows => Topic started by: bow101 on June 21, 2013, 11:57:41 pm

Title: Tri Lam
Post by: bow101 on June 21, 2013, 11:57:41 pm
Thinking of making a Tri lam for my next project.  I have some yew, and gonna buy either Red/White oak or Maple.  Should I use use the yew as the center lam.....???  The yew I have is like Rock hard...... :o :o :o
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Dances with squirrels on June 22, 2013, 12:26:07 am
I would go with a backing piece of maple and two lams of yew... which will give kind of the classic yew look... with the maple looking like the yew's sapwood.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Pat B on June 22, 2013, 12:35:23 pm
The yew is strong in compression so it would be a good belly wood. Dances has a good suggestion but you could also do a maple backed yew without doing a tri-lam.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Roy on June 22, 2013, 03:42:58 pm
I would go with the tri lam. Tri lam bows take on such a nice deflex/reflex profile. So much sexier than just two sections glued together. Here is an Osage, Osage, and Boo tri lam I am working on now. I flipped the tips with heat on both Osage lams before glue up.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: bow101 on June 22, 2013, 07:27:42 pm
Thanks for the info guys.  Ok this is what I'm looking at now, today I was cutting some lam material. Old scrap lying around.

Belly = Yew
Core= White oak X2
Back= Douglas fir

Total 4 lams, have to use 4 to get the thickness, its what I have......... ::)  will that work......?
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Cardboard_Duck on June 22, 2013, 07:33:24 pm
Just do the opposite of what Roy tells you and you'll be fine, I think he's finally hit the senile stage in his life >:D
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: bubby on June 22, 2013, 07:38:15 pm
white oak is almost unbreakable, I wouldn't sandwich it, you can do what you want but if it was me i'd go maple yew and try and get a sap wood look, if you want to do a tri lam put some epe, walnut or even osage in the middle and get some nice color, go to all that effort ya might as well get a shooter that is pretty
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Roy on June 22, 2013, 09:15:08 pm
I'm not familiar with Douglas fir for a backing, I'm thinking no.

Hey Ducker Boy, ya just made the thumpin list son:)
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: bow101 on June 22, 2013, 09:22:56 pm
I'm not familiar with Douglas fir for a backing, I'm thinking no.

Hey Ducker Boy, ya just made the thumpin list son:)

There is Pro bow builder on another site and he swears by it.  He made a few takedown bows using DF, which is my plan as well.
Any whooo my question was again; use Yew on the Belly as Pat B recommended.?
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Roy on June 22, 2013, 09:49:58 pm
Yes on yew belly, take pictures and keep us posted.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: twisted hickory on June 22, 2013, 10:14:37 pm
I would go with the tri lam. Tri lam bows take on such a nice deflex/reflex profile. So much sexier than just two sections glued together. Here is an Osage, Osage, and Boo tri lam I am working on now. I flipped the tips with heat on both Osage lams before glue up.
Roy,
Just curious whats the unstrung profile look like? Picts?
Thanks,
Greg
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Roy on June 22, 2013, 10:38:42 pm
Here ya go TH.......
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: adb on June 23, 2013, 12:05:53 pm
I've used yew as both mid-lam and belly wood in tri-lams. If you use yew as your core, make it thin... 1/4" or less. I also would NOT use fir as a backing. The white oak or maple will be much better.

I really like maple backed yew. It's probably one of my favourites. I've had good success with it, even with warbows up to 115#.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Zion on June 23, 2013, 06:28:36 pm
I've heard of people using the bottom sides of fir branches for the compression (belly) of the bow with birch backs. Seems like a good lightweight combo to me, might be something to think about.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: vinemaplebows on June 23, 2013, 06:36:56 pm
The guy is full of crap......Douglas fir is worthless for backing, and not much use in belly wood either. Doug fir heartwood "can" make a bow, but there are way to many choices here on the west coast to mess with fir. Old growth will make good arrows, not bows. Exceptions would be under glass. :) Still don't see a point. :)

If you have yew, and oak .....yew would be the belly, oak the back in my opinion. ;)

VMB
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: Roy on June 23, 2013, 08:02:42 pm
Tri Lam finished on the tree..
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: twisted hickory on June 23, 2013, 08:31:50 pm
Here ya go TH.......
Thanks much, I am going to try on a solid piece of hickory this winter. Gotta make a jig and it might take a bit of heat work but it's worth a try. I like the profile and seems like it would be fast if done correctly.
Greg
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: toomanyknots on June 23, 2013, 11:41:47 pm
The guy is full of crap......Douglas fir is worthless for backing, and not much use in belly wood either. Doug fir heartwood "can" make a bow, but there are way to many choices here on the west coast to mess with fir. Old growth will make good arrows, not bows. Exceptions would be under glass. :) Still don't see a point. :)

If you have yew, and oak .....yew would be the belly, oak the back in my opinion. ;)

VMB

I don't know who this guy is or anything and I am not gonna say anything bad about him or his experience, but the fir I have used (in 2 x 4 lumber form and all) definitely doesn't strike me as a tension strong wood? It seems brittle if anything. But of course, I have never used it as a backing, so I honestly don't know. I have been using some hard maple lately though I picked up for super cheap, it has worked just great. I am loving it, nice tight grain, nice and bendy and tension strong, and also light in weight compared to hickory or bamboo. That has got to be my favorite part. I haven't been able to break a bow made with it yet.
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: vinemaplebows on June 24, 2013, 02:05:17 am
Yes, hard maple makes great backing, as does white oak, ash, and of course hickory. There may be a species of fir out there that will make a good backing (I have never heard of it) But douglas fir....not even in the same league. :)

VMB
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: bubby on June 24, 2013, 03:56:55 am
all ya got to do is check out my bows to know how much I like hard maple, like vmb said it's great stuff
Title: Re: Tri Lam
Post by: bow101 on June 24, 2013, 06:01:36 pm
The guy is full of crap......Douglas fir is worthless for backing, and not much use in belly wood either. Doug fir heartwood "can" make a bow, but there are way to many choices here on the west coast to mess with fir. Old growth will make good arrows, not bows. Exceptions would be under glass. :) Still don't see a point. :)

If you have yew, and oak .....yew would be the belly, oak the back in my opinion. ;)

VMB

I don't know who this guy is or anything and I am not gonna say anything bad about him or his experience, but the fir I have used (in 2 x 4 lumber form and all) definitely doesn't strike me as a tension strong wood? It seems brittle if anything. But of course, I have never used it as a backing, so I honestly don't know. I have been using some hard maple lately though I picked up for super cheap, it has worked just great. I am loving it, nice tight grain, nice and bendy and tension strong, and also light in weight compared to hickory or bamboo. That has got to be my favorite part. I haven't been able to break a bow made with it yet.

Ok so I goofed up; the Douglas fir is used under [Glass].  So forget I even mentioned it..

Like bubby said, sticking with oak and maple is best bet, easy to get and cheap.  I did a test glue up with the Yew yesterday, went out to the garage and pulled the limb she snapped easier than bending a toothpick. So the yew is out of the question, to dry and very brittle, only good for handles and tip overlays, I'll pick-up some maple.

"Roy that bow looks really nice. "