I will add my opinion as a relatively new subscriber--I am not particularly interested in muzzle-loaders except as a hand craft--that is the process of making one like Eric Krewson's buildalong a while back. If you must include them to keep the magazine alive, then so be it, but keep it limited, and probably limited to flint locks and truly primitive style firearms, not cartridge based. Consider how many subscribers you know you are losing to format changes against how many you think you might gain. Why would a muzzle loader fan even find a primitive archery magazine? I saw this happen with my other hobby -- model airplane building and flying. If you open one of the R/C magazines I used to love and subscribe to today, you will see nothing but quadcopter drones and pre-built Chinese foam garbage--not the hand-crafted works of flying art I really enjoy. When I discovered the PA website and the craftsmanship of so many of its members, I have shifted most of my attention here, because it replaces that passion that I used to see in the model building community. If this site and its magazine shift away from that core value to the give-it-to-me-now, instant-gratification kind of mentality I see everywhere else, then I don't know what I will do, but I would likely be looking elsewhere for what really matters about this community.
Just something for the editors to consider. Thanks for creating this site. I hope it stays true to its roots.