Author Topic: IPE is some strong stuff!  (Read 8739 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Re: IPE is some strog stuff!
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2015, 12:33:17 pm »
  Is the bow going to bend through the handle?

Offline carpholeo

  • Member
  • Posts: 58
Re: IPE is some strog stuff!
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2015, 01:46:03 pm »
semi bend through handle, but im open to suggestions at this point

Offline vinemaplebows

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,419
Re: IPE is some strog stuff!
« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2015, 02:27:57 pm »
Yah... me too. I think you're putting way more into bow making design than there is. And, making wood bows by 'feel' is the best way IMHO. Wood is wood, and each piece is very different, even of the same species, or even from the same tree for that matter. I don't think blueprints and mathematical designs work for wood bows. Just my opinion.

I think you are right.....except I think if you start at a given size (any size) weigh it, you might get close if both pieces weigh close to the same with the same MC. The mathmatics is a good base line, although a bit over my head....math is not my strong suite.
Debating is an intellectual exchange of differing views...with no winners.

Offline Onebowonder

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,495
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #18 on: March 02, 2015, 04:59:06 pm »
It's not that mathematics or engineering and design principles somehow 'don't apply' to bow building with organic materials, as they most certainly do.  Rather, the issue is in the inability to effectively measure.  Applied Mathematics is the slave of measurements.  Without effective means to measure ALL the variables, a near impossibility, the mathematics can get no more effectively close than an educated guess.  When we can either eliminate the variables (i.e. straight grained wood with no run-out), or improve our ability to measure the factors involved (i.e. by using a moisture meter or digital calipers), we make the results of our mathematics work MUCH more reliable. 

The limits of materials science are amplified the closer you approach to the limits of the performance of the material.  Being as the best performing bows are made from the least possible amount of material, logically, higher performance bow building is at or near the limits of the material.

The intuitive method of bow making does not ignore the mathematics of materials science involved, ...it just uses a process of perceptions that are more difficult to measure, define, or quantify.  After a while we say things like, "I just knew that I could get a few more pounds out of that limb" or "I had a feeling it was going to give way at that point".  Hardly a predictable science, but the guys that do it are far too consistent to all just be lucky!


OneBow

Offline joachimM

  • Member
  • Posts: 675
  • Good - better - broken
Re: IPE is some strog stuff!
« Reply #19 on: March 02, 2015, 05:28:34 pm »
Sorry guys for the math...
I tried to give an answer to your question: how thin does the board need to be for it to bend (and make a bow). Since I don't know how much it draws at the given thickness, I tried to provide a way how to calculate the required thickness yourself.
I know that not all pieces of wood are the same, but to a large degree, there are constants on which to build. Otherwise we wouldn't all want to make osage bows instead of willow, and you could as well take a belly of douglas fir instead of ipe. Onebowonder gave a good account of the limits of maths in bow design. Within a single board, odds are high this math approach will yield useful results.

Let me try to make it simpler through a few well-know facts in archery:
As bow width doubles, the draw weight doubles. Very logic and intuitive: you doubled the amount of bow, so the draw weight follows that ratio.
 
as the bow thickness doubles, the draw weight is multiplied by eight (TBB vol 1: tillering, by Jim Hamm). This is much less intuitive.
So if you have a bow of draw weight 20#, a similar bow of twice the thickness would draw 160# at the same draw length (if the wood could stand the compression and tension at that thickness and draw length). This is because thickness and draw weight follow a cubic (power 3) relation. 
doubling thickness: original thickness times 2. Draw weight is then 2*2*2=23=two to the power of three = 8 times more

Adding or removing a tiny bit of thickness has a large influence, and this is what makes tillering so critical: one pass too many with the rasp can make the difference between a 40# and a 60# bow.

Suppose you increase or decrease thickness not by double or half, but by some smaller degree, what is the expected draw weight?
You take the relative amount you increase or decrease in thickness, multiply by itself two times and multiply by the former draw weight.

To go from 1 cm thick at 30#, to 1.1 cm, you multiply by 1.1. Take this to the power 3 (1.1*1.1*1.1 = 1.33), and this number tells you how much the draw weight is expected to increase. So at 1.1 cm thick, all other things being equal, you end up with a draw weight of 30#*1.33=39.90#

You can also do the opposite: if you know the draw weight at some thickness but want another draw weight, how thick should the limb be?  (this was the initial question here, more or less).

Suppose the thickness is some value A and gives a draw weight of say 80#, how thick should I make it to get to my target draw weight of, say, 60#? Or for your ipe board: how thick should the belly plus backing be to get to your intended draw weight?
I added a very simple excel sheet that allows you to calculate this by giving current draw weight, current thickness, intended draw weight. The output is the required total thickness (ipe plus bamboo) for the intended draw weight.
 
For you imperialists, I even added a inch-decimal inch-cm conversion chart  ::)
So you can forget all i wrote above, and just enter the numbers in the excel sheet and see how the output (in red) changes. Since you will need to pre-tiller the ipe belly for best results, you might as well have an idea what a certain thickness of bamboo lam will do to the draw weight.
Hope it helps.


Offline carpholeo

  • Member
  • Posts: 58
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2015, 05:43:06 pm »

Offline joachimM

  • Member
  • Posts: 675
  • Good - better - broken
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #21 on: March 02, 2015, 06:13:33 pm »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y0yolPv7tU
 
As long as you realize that shaving off wood will make the bow easier to draw, you can just goad ahead on that board and shave wood off till you can bend it. That will give you the answer to your question how thick the board should be in order to bend.

 

Offline vinemaplebows

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,419
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #22 on: March 02, 2015, 06:32:00 pm »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y0yolPv7tU
 
As long as you realize that shaving off wood will make the bow easier to draw, you can just goad ahead on that board and shave wood off till you can bend it. That will give you the answer to your question how thick the board should be in order to bend.

 


Glad you posted that.....I feel better now.....about those beans..... :laugh:
Debating is an intellectual exchange of differing views...with no winners.

Offline paco664

  • Member
  • Posts: 307
  • ok,ok.. i might have done it...
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #23 on: March 02, 2015, 06:36:52 pm »
 :-\...I'm gonna need that slower and dumber please. .. lol. .. :laugh:
I'm too drunk to taste this chicken"~Col.H.Sanders

Offline Springbuck

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,545
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2015, 08:48:01 pm »
  Ipe is very striong.. It took me at least 5 bows early on, doing boo/ipe to realize that I was  scraping off more ipe than I was leaving...ending up in hunting weights, 1.5" wide 68" R/D bows that were barely 3/8" thick.  Ipe is STIFF.


I must be the only guy here who has never done the ELB with it.

mikekeswick

  • Guest
Re: IPE is some strong stuff!
« Reply #25 on: March 04, 2015, 02:47:37 am »
joachimM - You are dead on.
Onbowwonder - You too.
People say oh this stuff isn't applicable to wooden bows blah blah....true you don't need to use maths but boy oh boy can it take the guess work out. Rulers aren't much use calipers allow you to measure accurately enough for the forumals to be useful.