Author Topic: Mystery log #2 - some more detail  (Read 1624 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline doggonemess

  • Member
  • Posts: 123
    • That's My Web Guy
Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« on: July 13, 2012, 07:23:24 pm »
Greetings, per my previous post where I misidentified evil wood as locust, I wanted to provide more images of the mystery log. I took some of the end grain as requested, and can tell you one more detail. The raw wood has a pleasant, not-fruity odor, but hard to describe. It doesn't smell sweet and watermelon-y like maple, and doesn't stink like red oak. It almost smells like it could be a 'savory' flavor.

I'm not going to eat it, I swear. Anyway, here are the images:







The bark is very thin. It does not come off without effort.



This gives you an idea of the size and shape. It's pretty heavy, probably about 30 lbs for a four-ish foot section.

"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true." - Robert Wilensky

Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.

Offline KHalverson

  • Member
  • Posts: 758
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2012, 07:28:02 pm »
not an expert by any means but looks like a species of hickory
or ash

blackhawk

  • Guest
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2012, 08:00:09 pm »
Hickory..but it looks like it has almost 90 degrees of twist in it,and not very straight either

Offline okie64

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,134
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2012, 08:13:49 pm »
Thats mulberry, the rings look way too thick for any hickory ive ever seen.

Offline mitch

  • Member
  • Posts: 63
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2012, 09:06:49 pm »
Mullberry i bet
"Any old stick will do for a bow, but the arrow gets the deer." Ishi

Offline gstoneberg

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,889
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2012, 09:15:19 pm »
Might be mulberry...or hickory, but it probably doesn't matter.  That twist really is too bad to build a bow with that much character from.  Blackhawk is right.

George
St Paul, TX

Offline crooketarrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,790
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2012, 10:30:58 pm »
I just cut and split 4 logs of it this spring it's MALLBERRIE.
  It's a cousin to OSAGE, WOODS ALMOST AS GOLDEN AS OSAGE BUT NOT QUITE AS YELLOWESH GOLD MORE LIGHT YELLOWEST.
DEAD IS DEAD NO MATTER HOW FAST YOUR ARROW GETS THERE
20 YEARS OF DOING 20 YEARS OF LEARNING 20 YEARS OF TEACHING

Offline TRACY

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,523
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2012, 11:50:57 pm »
Thats mulberry, the rings look way too thick for any hickory ive ever seen.

I'll solidly agree!
It is what it is - make the most of it!    PN500956

Offline paulsemp

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,918
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #8 on: July 13, 2012, 11:56:57 pm »
 mulberry

Offline DarkSoul

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,315
    • Orion Bows
Re: Mystery log #2 - some more detail
« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2012, 05:59:05 pm »
Looks like mulberry. Those markings on the bark are a good give-away. Ring like structures, evenly spaced along the length of the log.

It also looks an aweful lot like sumac. Is that resin leaking out of the bark on the cut ends? Does mulberry have this resin? Sumac does! The more I look at the pictures, the more I'm leaning towards sumac...
If in doubt, hold a piece of heartwood under a blacklight UV light. If the wood lights up bright yellowish green, it is sumac. If it doesn't change color, it's mulberry.
"Sonuit contento nervus ab arcu."
Ovid, Metamorphoses VI-286